Friday, September 23, 2016

Kevin Levin's Verbal Hit Piece on Susan Hathaway and the Virginia Flaggers

Today, we fact check and truth check a blatantly hostile piece of writing by Kevin Levin that appeared in the ultra leftist Daily Beast. You can read the whole thing here: http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/09/21/for-the-virginia-flaggers-it-s-hate-not-heritage.html  The piece strives to make a case that the title, "For the Virginia Flaggers, It's Hate, Not Heritage," is the truth. It fails.

Levin writes,
"...few reporters have looked closely at Flagger membership or the individuals and organizations with which it has found common cause. Some of these individuals are directly connected with White Nationalist groups such as the League of the South, which openly promote white supremacy. Such a close association blurs the lines between legitimate concerns for the preservation of history and heritage and the racial politics of the present."

Levin's use of nonspecific quantifying ("some of these individuals") could be considered misleading, and the term "has found common cause" is highly misleading. Besides the League of the South, what "white nationalist" groups is Levin talking about?  He identifies no others. To use the plural makes it sound like the Flaggers have found "common cause" with many groups, but unless he names them, we have to conclude that the "white nationalist groups" accusation is deliberately deceptive.

That a small handful of League members have attended heritage events does not give the League "common cause" with Confederate heritage. Regardless of how the individuals may feel, the League has grown increasingly hostile to Confederate heritage. No "common cause" there. Nor is there a "close association" between the Flaggers and the League, or any other non-heritage organization. I am calling this terminology an outright lie.

Levin writes,
"Their (the Flaggers') understanding of the war falls neatly within the confines of the Lost Cause narrative: Slavery had nothing to do with the cause of the war; relations between white and black Southerners were peaceful before the war; the Confederacy fought solely for states’ rights; and African Americans supported the cause in large numbers."
This is completely and totally his opinion, and not only a mistaken one, but a hostile one. Certainly slavery had something to do with the war, most people understand that. What heritage folks reject, however, is the binary, elementary-school view that the evil South was fighting solely to keep an entire race in chains, and the sainted north was fighting solely to free them. Everything in Levin's description is designed to paint heritage people as mental clones, all believing the same thing about one of the most complex events in our national history. Anybody who has been around the heritage community for a while knows how hard it is to get us to agree (like "herding cats") and knows about our legendary disagreements, the circular firing squads, etc. As much as Levin has obsessed over the heritage community, I'm sure he knows this. Thus, I'm calling this statement another deliberate falsehood.

What Levin neglects to mention about the banning of flags in Lexington for one weekend a year is that the push was spearheaded by an immigrant with hostility toward the South and its heritage, and no respect for us and our traditions, or that very likely, the petition to remove the flag included signatures of people who were not residents of the town. He also neglects to mention that the flags removed from Lee Chapel were done so at the behest of a small handful of African-American students, at least one of whom wished to recreate and step into the role of a demonstrator from the 1960s civil rights glory days. Levin did not mention how the "trauma" of these students over the sight of the battle flags in a small alcove of the chapel stacks up to (and, frankly, trivializes) the horrors that real civil rights activists encountered in the mid-20th century.

Levin writes,
"In 2012 the Flaggers were photographed parading with Matthew Heimbach. Heimbach was the founder of Towson State’s White Student Union and Towson’s Youth for Western Civilization. In 2014 he became the League of the South’s training director and is considered by the Southern Poverty Law Center to be the “new face of white nationalism.”

What Levin neglects to mention is that this handful of photos were not made at a Flagger sponsored event, and that most of the Flaggers had no idea who he was (and probably still don't), what he believed, where he was from, and what he had done at Towson, which they also did not know was the university he attended. Is a stranger walking next to you as you enter or leave a stadium for a football game a "close contact"? No.  Thus, Levin's term, "close contact" is not just a lie, it is a blatant lie.

While it is unfortunate that a couple of the landowners the Flaggers have a business arrangement with made bigoted remarks that have been reported on the Internet, that is not any sort of indication that anyone in the group shares those beliefs. Probably everyone has had to do business with people whose beliefs they find repugnant... for example, I've had to share a workplace with people who blatantly supported the killing of children in the womb, but you can rest assured, I did not and never will share that belief.

Levin's hostility to the VaFlaggers is rooted in his hostility to the South and our heritage, of which the Confederacy, the war and their aftermath, are an indelible and essential part. He takes the politically correct view of the evil, dirty South, because of slavery, while totally ignoring the north's enabling of slavery, and the north's enormous economic benefits from slavery. I think he probably has a lot of animosity for Southerners regardless of their views of the war and Confederate heritage.

I suspect if he doesn't share the view of his wife, as expressed on his blog a few years back, he doesn't really object to it. She was upset because she misinterpreted a graphic image of Obama as having a "bloody" face. It doesn't depict that, as I demonstrated here: http://mybacksass.blogspot.com/2012/12/a-wish-for-early-croakin.html

Because of her own misinterpretation of the image, and her blowing the comments up all out of proportion, she expressed this wish for an early death for Southerners:
"If they were in Germany they probably would still find many arguments why Hitler was such a “success”…all in the “gentle” spirit of “heritage”, excluding Jews, commies and the rest of “them”. The only thing that makes my day is that the overall education these people enjoy and their general attitude to life, especially their choice of diet will statistically make enough a difference that they croak earlier than the average person in the US. Bless their heart!"
Both of the Levins have exhibited hostility toward Southerners, their culture, history and heritage, and that hostility -- or is it outright hate? -- is clearly on display in Kevin's "Daily Beast" hit piece.
____________________

The Heimbach Files at Backsass

http://mybacksass.blogspot.com/2013/08/a-year-and-half-late.html
http://mybacksass.blogspot.com/2013/09/the-floggers-heimbach-maneuver-part-one.html
http://mybacksass.blogspot.com/2013/09/the-floggers-heimbach-maneuver-part-deux.html
http://mybacksass.blogspot.com/2013/09/nope-hes-still-not-flagger.html
http://mybacksass.blogspot.com/2013/09/how-to-assess-gooey-glibness.html
http://mybacksass.blogspot.com/2013/09/more-tiptoein-and-pogo-stickin.html
http://mybacksass.blogspot.com/2015/02/shes-still-confused.html

22 comments:

  1. When will you start taking apart these "attacks"...anytime in the near future? Will they include factual rebuttals or just nonsense?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Also, using Connie Chastain's "work" is not a positive on your part...it hurts your "argument".

    ReplyDelete
  3. Corey, anything that does not present your point of view will never be accepted by you and Levin. It is no wonder you rush to his defense when all other s individuals concerned about truth have left him. Remember, the first 3 casualties of PC/liberalism are 1) truth, 2)common sense, and 3) personal responsibility! You lack all 3!

    ReplyDelete
  4. It isn't that I don't accept others views in this case it's that Connie's views and apparently yours...are flat out wrong...and demonstrably wrong. And that is proved by your last sentence.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nice to see Connie using an Alias...something I got accused of more than once when it wasn't true.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Corey, my alias isn't for the purpose of deceit, was yours were/are.

    ReplyDelete
  7. So the only reason you can think of for using an alias is to deceive people... Why am I not surprised?

    ReplyDelete
  8. So why are you trying to deceive people?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm not. Presumably everyone knows this is my blog. The writing is in my style, as is the subject matter, the graphic, the layout, etc. Deception and infiltration are your dishonest approach, not mine.

      Delete
    2. And yet you don't use your name...

      Delete
    3. And yet you don't use your name...

      Delete
    4. Corey, "RBLee" at Restore the Honor doesn't use his name, so stuff it. But yes, this blog is in my name. Polly is just a contributor....

      Delete
    5. R. B. Lee is his real name as far as I know. You on the other had are full of crap.

      Delete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Levin:
    "...what is relevant here is that the Virginia Flaggers have chosen to partner with this individual [Hubert Wayne Cash]..."

    Shucks, I didn't know that- If you buy or lease land from someone, you are their partner?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is deliberate deceit on Levin's part.

      Delete
    2. Just cause you don't like the statement doesn't make it deliberate deceit. If you lease a car you are in a partnership/business with that car company and maker. Same with the flaggers and Cash.

      Delete
    3. Partnership with the car company and maker? Are you nuts? DO YOU KNOW HOW PARTNERSHIP IS LEGALLY DEFINED? It's not a simple business deal. It is nt a lease, a rental agreement, or a revolving charge account. In business, a partnership is CO-OWNERSHIP:

      An association of two or more persons engaged in a business enterprise in which the profits and losses are shared proportionally. The legal definition of a partnership is generally stated as "an association of two or more persons to carry on as co-owners a business for profit" http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Partnership

      Leasing some land is not a partnership. You're making yourself look more like an ignoramus with everything you post. That's what hate does for you ... you get so focused on slandering people you hate, obsessed with making them look bad, and you don't realize you are the one you're making look bad....

      Delete
  11. Levin's claim about "partnering" with Cash is a lie. Either that or he is abysmally ignorant about what a legal partnership is. Either way, he has used the false (or ignorant) term out of the motive of smearing and slandering the VaFlaggers.

    He had better make sure that anybody he has ever done business with is sinless, pure as the driven snow, because he could be held responsible for their sins just because he bought or leased something from them ...

    ReplyDelete
  12. You can spin and define all you want but it does not change a single thing.

    ReplyDelete
  13. You can spin and define all you want but it does not change a single thing.

    ReplyDelete